LEADERSHIP STYLES AND SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN PAKISTANI SMES: AN INDUSTRY 4.0 PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • DR. ALI RAZA Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, Pakistan Author
  • DR. SHEEMA MATLOOB School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia Author
  • DR. MUZAFAR HUSSAIN SHAH Department of Business Administration, Newports Institute of communication and economics, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • DR. IRSHAD HUSSAIN SARKI NCBA&E Campus Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00011

Keywords:

Leadership, Industry 4.0, SMEs, Organizational Learning, Pakistan

Abstract

Previous research has primarily concentrated on the technological and operational aspects of Industry 4.0 in SMEs, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of the leadership's role in this context. This article aforesaid gap by empirically investigating impact of entrepreneurial leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and ethical leadership on the sustainable competitive performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Pakistan within the context of Industry 4.0. The study adopts a quantitative approach and collects data from Pakistani SMEs sector, including manufacturing sports, and textiles, using purposive sampling. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed. The study's findings reveal that entrepreneurial leadership and ethical leadership significantly influence organizational learning. Furthermore, a significant relationship is observed between organizational learning and sustainable competitive performance. However, the study does not find a significant relationship between transactional leadership and organizational learning. Moreover, the research highlights a significant mediating relationship between organizational learning and the impact of entrepreneurial leadership, ethical leadership, and transformational leadership on sustainable competitive performance. However, transactional leadership does not exhibit a significant mediating effect. The study's contributions to the existing literature on Industry 4.0 are valuable as they shed light on the role of leadership styles in the context of SMEs in Pakistan. In the era of Industry 4.0, where technological advancements are transforming industries, understanding the impact of leadership on sustainable competitive performance is crucial. This research offers insights into which leadership styles are most effective in this rapidly changing landscape.

References

Anand, A., Agarwal, U. A., & Offergelt, F. (2023). Why should I let them know? Effects of workplace incivility and cynicism on employee knowledge hiding behavior under the control of ethical leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 44(2), 247-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2021-0248

Bär, K., Herbert-Hansen, Z. N. L., & Khalid, W. (2018). Considering Industry 4.0 aspects in the supply chain for an SME. Production Engineering, 12, 747-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0851-y

Bartram, T., & Casimir, G. (2007). The relationship between leadership and follower in‐role performance and satisfaction with the leader: The mediating effects of empowerment and trust in the leader. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 4-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710718218

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1622-1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.006

Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C., Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2018). The emergence of knowledge management (pp. 23-47). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_2

Boughton, N. J., & Arokiam, I. C. (2000). The application of cellular manufacturing: a regional small to medium enterprise perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 214(8), 751-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/0954405001518125

Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

Brunet-Thornton, R., & Martinez, F. (Eds.). (2018). Analyzing the impacts of industry 4.0 in modern business environments. IGI global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3468-6

Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of business and psychology, 14, 389-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022991115523

Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791-808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001

Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: a scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CiRp, 54, 13-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162

Garavan, T. (1997). The learning organization: a review and evaluation. The learning organization, 4(1), 18-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09696479710156442

García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of business research, 65(7), 1040-1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005

Greenberg, D., McKone-Sweet, K., & Wilson, H. J. (2011). The new entrepreneurial leader: Developing leaders who shape social and economic opportunity. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Gu, Q., Hu, D., & Hempel, P. (2022). Team reward interdependence and team performance: roles of shared leadership and psychological ownership. Personnel Review, 51(5), 1518-1533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0403

Guţă, A. L. (2012). The Learning Organization–An Answer To The Challenges Of The Actual Business Environment?. CES Working Papers, 4(3), 340-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2097484

Haseeb, M., Hussain, H. I., Ślusarczyk, B., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Industry 4.0: A solution towards technology challenges of sustainable business performance. Social Sciences, 8(5), 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050154

Hasib, F. F., Eliyana, A., Arief, Z., & Pratiwi, A. A. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership on employee performance mediated by leader-member exchange (LMX). Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(11).

Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2008). A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and non-leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 501-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.001

Kagermann, H. (2014). Change through digitization—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Management of permanent change (pp. 23-45). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_2

Khan, N. Z. A., Imran, A., & Anwar, A. (2019). Destructive leadership and job stress: causal effect of emotional exhaustion on job satisfaction of employees in call centers. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 11(1), 135.

Kumar, S., & Rao, P. (2015). A conceptual framework for identifying financing preferences of SMEs. Small Enterprise Research, 22(1), 99-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2015.1036504

Liao, S. H., Chen, C. C., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., & Yang, M. J. (2017). Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1431-1450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9532-1

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994506

Maresova, P., Soukal, I., Svobodova, L., Hedvicakova, M., Javanmardi, E., Selamat, A., & Krejcar, O. (2018). Consequences of industry 4.0 in business and economics. Economies, 6(3), 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030046

Mariappanadar, S. (2018). The impact of dissonance in schema based leadership perceptions on employee engagement: Evidence from Australia. Personnel Review, 47(7), 1309-1329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2017-0081

Matt, D. T., & Rauch, E. (2020). SME 4.0: The role of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the digital transformation. Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, opportunities and requirements, 3-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4_1

Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of management journal, 55(1), 151-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0276

Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2016). IT flexibility and competitive performance: The mediating role of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities.

Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: A study of tourist hotels. Tourism Management, 57, 118-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.007

Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of manufacturing systems, 49, 194-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005

Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International journal of production research, 56(3), 1118-1136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647

Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010247

Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8), 3100.

Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8), 3100.

Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8), 3100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083100

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). SMEs Statistics. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=81354

Otuya, S., & Okolo, P. O. (2019). Leadership and accountability in Nigerian universities: A critical factor for the nation’s sustainable development. British International Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 6(11), 21-27.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7

Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of small business Management, 53(1), 54-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086

Rojas, R. A., & Ruiz Garcia, M. A. (2020). Implementation of industrial internet of things and cyber-physical systems in smes for distributed and service-oriented control. Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements, 73-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4_3

Sahi, G. K., Gupta, M. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2020). The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.014

Saqib, S., Ahmad, M. M., Panezai, S., & Ali, U. (2016). Factors influencing farmers' adoption of agricultural credit as a risk management strategy: The case of Pakistan. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 17, 67-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.008

Shafi, M., Lei, Z., Song, X., & Sarker, M. N. I. (2020). The effects of transformational leadership on employee creativity: Moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(3), 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.002

Shah, T., & Mulla, Z. R. (2013). Leader motives, impression management, and charisma: A comparison of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Management and Labour Studies, 38(3), 155-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X13509736

Sitorus, P., Sarkum, S., & Nasution, M. F. (2021). The Influence of Transformasional Leadership Style, Organizational Justice, Employee Engagament and Employee Reaction on Employee Performance. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3), 4076-4084.

Sommer, L. (2015). Industrial revolution-industry 4.0: Are German manufacturing SMEs the first victims of this revolution?. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(5), 1512-1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1470

Tarabishy, A., Solomon, G., Fernald Jr, L. W., & Sashkin, M. (2005). The entrepreneurial leader's impact on the organization's performance in dynamic markets. The Journal of private equity, 20-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2005.580519

Thanh, N. H., & Quang, N. V. (2019). Ethical leadership in the digital era: Requirements for developing ethical leaderships in Vietnam. The International Journal of Business & Management, 7(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2019/v7/i7/BM1907-028

Türkeș, M. C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H. D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D. I., & Căpușneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: a perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7(3), 153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030153

Velt, H., Torkkeli, L., & Saarenketo, S. (2020). Transnational entrepreneurial ecosystems: The perspectives of Finnish and Estonian born-global start-ups. Research handbook on start-up incubation ecosystems, 110-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973533.00013

Vrchota, J., Volek, T., & Novotná, M. (2019). Factors introducing Industry 4.0 to SMES. Social Sciences, 8(5), 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050130

Zainol, F. A., Daud, W. N. W., Shamsu, L., Abubakar, H. S., & Halim, H. A. (2018). A linkage between entrepreneurial leadership and SMEs performance: An integrated review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 104-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4000

Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122114

Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Bo Chen, L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(2), 293-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00359.x

Downloads

Published

2023-10-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RAZA, D. A. ., MATLOOB, D. S. ., SHAH, D. M. H., & SARKI, D. I. H. . (2023). LEADERSHIP STYLES AND SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN PAKISTANI SMES: AN INDUSTRY 4.0 PERSPECTIVE. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(3), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00011