Social Media Fuels Polarization in Muslim Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00046Keywords:
Social media, political polarization, religiously, fake and emotional contentAbstract
The majority of People are Polarize online in Muslim countries of world. It is very easy to create polarize groups with the use of Social Media. The purpose of the study to measures Polarization and the echo chamber feature of Social Media in Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The results suggested that Social Media Polarization extreme form is existed and also confirmed that Social Media new Algorithms creating echo chambers. The interesting results suggested that our respondent wants diversity not echo chamber. People are politically Polarize because of fake and emotional content. It is the responsibility of the Social Media companies to watch for this type of content which makes people divide socially, religiously, and politically.
References
Ahmad, S. (2018, February 24). Unleashing the potential of a young Pakistan | Human Development Reports.
Allen, summer. (2019, September 20). Social media’s growing impact on our lives. Https://Www.Apa.Org. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e511572019-001
Azzimonti, M., & Fernandes, M. (2018, March 1). Social Media Networks, Fake News, and Polarization. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24462
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., … Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
Cherry, K. (2019, July 2). Cognitive Dissonance and Ways to Resolve It. Very well Mind.
Hunter, R. (2020, February 25). Education in Pakistan.
In book: Soul of Society: A Focus on the Lives of Children & Youth (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Volume 18), Publisher: Emerald, Editors: M. Nicole Warehime, pp.253 – 273
Lau, T. and Akkaraju, U., 2020. When Algorithms Decide Whose Voices Will Be Heard. [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at: <https://hbr.org/2019/11/when-algorithms-decide-whose-voice-will-be-heard> [Accessed 15 July 2020].
Stroud, N. J. (2017, August 24). Selective Exposure Theories. Oxford Handbooks Online.
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
Political Polarization. (2019). Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: https://www.pewresearch.org/topics/political-polarization/
Silver, L., Devlin, K., & Huang, C. (2020, February 30). Republicans see China more negatively than Democrats, even as criticism rises in both parties.
Tyson, A. (2020, February 22). Republicans remain far less likely than Democrats to view COVID-19 as a major threat to public health.
Shemla, M. (2018, August 28). Why workplace diversity is so important, and why it’s so hard to achieve.
Sunstein, C. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wit, L., Brick, C. and van der Linden, S., 2020. Are social media driving political polarization?
