The Impact of AI Generated Advertising Content on Consumer Buying Behavior and Consumer Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00476Keywords:
AI Generated Advertising Content, Consumer Engagement, Consumer Buying Behavior, AI Abilities, Emotions and FeelingsAbstract
This Study explores the difference between human generated advertising content and the AI generated Advertising content and this research explore the impact on AI generated advertising content on consumer engagement and consumer buying behavior. Qualitative approach used to unveil the perception about AI Generated Advertising content in the perspective of Marketers and AI experts and answer that what is different in humanly created advertising content and Ai generated advertising content. This study elaborates the impact of AIGAC on brands sales volumes and competitive edges. Researcher conducted interviews of marketers and creative directors to explore the phenomenon in their expert opinion. The research work highlights the importance of this emerging tool in industry and its contribution in brand building process specially brand communication strategies. This study discusses the abilities and accuracy of AI in Advertising particularly when we talk about human feelings and emotions. Finally, consumer perception about AI also concluded this study. Researcher found AI generated advertising content more effective than the humanly generated advertising content for Consumer Engagements and Consumer Buying Behavior. AI create more balanced and vibrant combinations in creativity of ads. Researcher finds that AI generated Advertising content will boost sales due to its high appeal of creativity. This study will provide direction to the practitioners for their future strategies regarding brand building, brand communication and Sales strategies. Future researches can get guidelines for their thematic researches.
References
Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548
Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., Grewal, D., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2015). Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 34-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005
Bilgihan, A., Kandampully, J., & Zhang, T. (2016). Towards a unified customer experience in online shopping environments: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(1), 102-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2015-0054
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 24-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
Wu, J., Gan, W., Chen, Z., Wan, S., & Lin, H. (2023). AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A Survey. arXiv (Cornell University).
Ebrahimi, S., & Fanaeepour, M. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence on Enhancing CRM. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(6), 100-107.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1978). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12-25.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554- 571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical education, 40(4), 314-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Qin, X., and Z. Jiang. 2019. The impact of AI on the advertising process: The Chinese experience. Journal of Advertising 48 (4):338–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1652122
Pawle, J., and P. Cooper. 2006. Measuring emotion Love marks, the future beyond brands. Journal of Advertising Research 46 (1):38–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060053
