British Indian Railways: The Economic Wheel of Colonization and Imperialism

Authors

  • Muhammad Akmal Soomro Ph.D. Political Science, Public Relations Officer, University of Home Economics Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Mir Waheed Akhlaq Assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00282

Keywords:

Indian Railways, British Imperialism, British Colonial Policy, Plundering

Abstract

The British Crown ruled in Sub-Continent for over two centuries, this was the era of darkness, slavery, the plundering of Indian resources, and ruthless economics & political policies. Indian land remained a consumer society and the producer of raw materials for the British Empire from the eighteen to the twentieth century, whereas, the vast and modern network of railways in India is considered to be Britain's greatest gift to the Indians. Undoubtedly, these railways have been an important means of transportation in India, but the British Colonizers did not build this system of railways in the public interest rather it was laid to serve the colonial interest. This research article identifies Britain’s strategic and economic interests in building railways in India. Construction of railways in India began in 1850 and European companies had been awarded contracts to build railway tracks, in return for the contracts, the companies were guaranteed five percent investment security. The companies were also given access to free land for 99 years and millions of pounds in fines were paid to the companies from the Indian exchequer for non-payment of guaranteed income. The main purpose of building the railway was to speed up the export of cotton, jute, iron, minerals, etc. from India to European countries, while from a strategic point of view, military equipment and supplies were also transferred by rail to military bases across India. This research paper explores how the railway track was built keeping in view the importance of military barracks. Under the British colonial policy, European companies invested heavily in the railways, but during 200 years of British rule, India's industrial growth rate fell from 3% to 10%. All the agreements made by the British colonizers with the railway companies were unilateral. The agreements provided financial benefits from the Indian treasury to companies. This research also reveals that India's railway network was built by the government through private companies, which included European capitalists and retired officers of the colonial army, who were having control over the London-based secretary of state of India. These companies were so powerful, that whenever the Government of India complained of a breach of contract and tried to end it, it was the Secretary of the state who rejected the decisions of the Governor-General of India. On the other hand, the expense for the construction of railways was £15000 more per mile than it was in the United States and Europe. 

References

Allen, R. C. (2009). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816680

Anwar, M. T., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Impact of railways on forests in Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 4(4), 76-84.

Ashraf, M., Shahbaz, B., & Ali, I. (2019). Impact of railways on forest cover change in Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 56(2), 487-492.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.

Bose, S. (2007). Building railways in colonial India: The impact on India's transport system and its economy. South Asia Economic Journal, 8(1), 101-118.

Bose, S. (2008). The Iron Snake: The railway in British India and its social impact. The Journal of Transport History, 29(2), 282-283.

Bose, S. (2019). British imperial plunder: Historical legacy and contemporary challenges. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 55(3), 369-383.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

Chakrabarty, D. (2012). The black hole of empire: History of a global practice of power. Postcolonial Studies, 15(1), 13-36.

Chakraborty, P. (2017). The Indian Railways and the Great Game. Indian Historical Review, 44(2), 297-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0376983617726649

Chakraborty, A. (2019). The railways in British India: an economic achievement? The Journal of Transport History, 40(1), 65-79.

Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and Its fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691201429

Chatterji, J. (1999). Divide and Rule: The Partition of British India. Cambridge University Press.

Das, Pallavi (2010). Colonialism and the environment in India; railways and de-forestation in 19th century Punjab. Journal of Asian African Studies, 45(1), 42-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909610388015

Das, S., Ghosh, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2013). Railways and forests in British India: a historical analysis of environmental consequences. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 7(10), 47-55.

Deb, B. (2012). The politics of railway construction in Colonial Bengal: A study of the Bengal–Nagpur railway. Modern Asian Studies, 46(2), 423-457.

Desai, A. (2011). Land acquisition and the expansion of railways in British India, 1850–1900. Journal of Historical Geography, 37(2), 173-183.

Fanon, F. (1961). The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press.

Foreman, James (1989). Foreign investment and imperial exploitation; balance of payments reconstruction for 19th Century Britain India, pp. 366-67, Economic History Society.

Ghosh, S. (2016). Ecological consequences of Railway expansion in Colonial India. Environment and History, 22(2), 197-222.

Guha, R. (2007). The East India Company and the plunder of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(4), 303-309.

Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. South End Press.

Irfan Habib. Colonialization of the Indian Economy, 1757 – 1900. Social Scientist, 3(8), 23-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3516224

Kazmi, S. (2013). Colonial Intervention in Awadh: Indigenous Political Structures And Indirect Rule In Eighteenth Century. Proceedings Of the Indian History Congress, 74, 447-457.

Kerr, I. J. (1995). Building the Railways of the Raj from 1850 to 1900. Oxford University Press.

Kerr, I. J. (2006). The 'Great Game' and the Construction of the Transcaspian Railway. The Geographical Journal, 172(3), 214-229.

Kincaid, J. (1988). A Small Place. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Low, D. A. (1969). Private Enterprise and Colonial Railways: The Early British Railways in Bengal. The Economic History Review, 22(2), 329-341.

Miles Taylor. The English Maharani: Queen Victoria and India. Penguin Random House India Private Limited, 2018.

Mukherjee, R. (2010). The Penguin History of Modern India: From the Decline of the Mughals to the Present. Penguin Books.

Nalinksha, Sanyal (1930). Development of Indian Railways. University of Calcutta.

Ray, R. (1995). The Battle of Plassey and the consolidation of British power in Bengal. Modern Asian Studies, 29(4), 883-919.

Ray, R. (2012). The politics of the Indian Railways, 1875–1900. Past & Present, 214(1), 215-254.

Roy, T. (2002). The politics of railways in Colonial India: networks, symbols, and change. Social Scientist, 30(9/10), 3-23.

Roy, T. (2006). The economic drain from India in the last quarter of the eighteenth century: Assessing the lost surplus. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 43(1), 51-77.

Sabina Kazmi: Colonial Intervention in Awadh: Indigenous Political Structures and Indirect Rule in Eighteenth Century, Proceedings Of The Indian History Congress, 74,

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage Books.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Soomro, M. A. ., & Akhlaq, M. W. . (2023). British Indian Railways: The Economic Wheel of Colonization and Imperialism. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(3), 895-902. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00282