Impact of AI on Communication Relationship and Social Dynamics: A qualitative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00283Keywords:
artificial intelligence, social mediaAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into social media platforms has ushered in a new era of digital communication, offering unprecedented opportunities for content curation, relationship-building, and information exchange. Through this qualitative study, we have explored the multifaceted impact of AI-driven algorithms and natural language processing (NLP) technologies on user experiences and societal dynamics, addressing key research objectives and questions. Our findings underscore the transformative potential of AI in enhancing content curation and user interaction on social media platforms. Participants highlighted the benefits of personalized content recommendations and AI-enabled features such as chatbots, which streamline user interactions and provide instant support. Furthermore, AI algorithms play a crucial role in facilitating relationship-building through friend suggestions and group recommendations, fostering community engagement and social connections among users. However, alongside these benefits, our study also revealed significant challenges and ethical concerns associated with AI integration in social media. Participants expressed concerns about the proliferation of echo chambers and misinformation, fueled by algorithmic biases and the spread of false information through social bots. Privacy considerations emerged as a prominent issue, with participants emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in AI implementation to safeguard user data and mitigate risks of algorithmic surveillance. In light of these findings, it is evident that the responsible deployment of AI technologies is paramount in ensuring positive user experiences and preserving the integrity of digital information ecosystems. Ethical considerations must guide the design and implementation of AI-driven algorithms, prioritizing transparency, fairness, and user empowerment. Platform operators, policymakers, and civil society stakeholders must collaborate to develop robust regulatory frameworks and governance mechanisms that uphold ethical standards and protect user rights in the digital age.
References
Arnaboldi, V., Guazzini, A., Passarella, A., & Conti, M. (2013). Egocentric online social networks: Analysis of key features and prediction of tie strength in Facebook. Computer Communications, 36(10–11), 1130–1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2013.03.003
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '12), 519–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907
Boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Chancellor, S., Lin, Z., Goodman, E. L., Zerwas, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2016). Quantifying and predicting mental illness severity in online pro-eating disorder communities. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 1173–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819973
Dale, R. (2016). The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811–817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (pp. 67–82). Erlbaum.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720934928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164
Quader, M. (2024). Exploring Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Satisfaction in Bangladesh’s Private Banking Sector. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 36-45.
Rogers, R. (2018). Digital methods. MIT Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2016). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Political Communication, 33(4), 1–22
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
