Assessing Harmless Errors in Offenses against Human Body and Property: A Review of Court Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00303Keywords:
harmless, offenses, human body, propertyAbstract
The current study aims to identify different harmless errors in crimes involving harm to the human body and property. An error that is deemed "harmless" refers to errors made in a judicial decision that do not lead to the overturning of said decision. Many studies have been conducted abroad to identify harmless errors in the background of various subjects, such as constitutional law, criminal law, and civil law. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research on harmless errors in criminal cases in Pakistan. Through the use of qualitative content analysis, this study discovered that despite various issues such as delays, failure to fulfill legal requirements, and incomplete testimonies, the appellate court upheld the conviction of the accused. According to the study, the appellate courts did not give sufficient consideration to the inconsistencies in witness testimonies and other evidence related to minor matters, nor did they adequately address the prosecution's presentation or lack of certain witnesses and evidence. This study will provide valuable insights for both academics and professionals seeking to gain a deeper understanding of the non-malicious errors that can occur in offenses involving harm to the human body and property.
References
ABDUL HAFEEZ alias AZEEM Versus the STATE (2020 P Cr. L J Note 18)
ABDUL RAUF alias KALA Versus the STATE (2021 M L D 1305)
ALLAH BAKHSH alias BAKHSHI Versus the STATE (2021 M L D 1525)
ALLAH YAR Versus the STATE (2022 M L D 350)
ARSHAD and others Versus the STATE (2005 P Cr. L J 975)
ASGHAR ALI Versus the STATE and another (2016 Y L R 2601)
ASHIQ HUSSAIN Versus ARSHAD MEHMOOD (2021 Y L R Note 83)
BASHIR AHMED LEGHARI Versus the STATE (2020 S C M R 595)
Berger, M. A. (1991). When, if ever, does evidentiary error constitute reversible error. Loy. LAL Rev., 25, 893.
Carter, L. E. (1993). Harmless error in the penalty phase of a capital case: a doctrine misunderstood and misapplied. Ga. L. Rev., 28, 125.
Carter, L. E. (2000). The Sporting Approach to Harmless Error in Criminal Cases: The Supreme Court's No Harm, No Foul Debacle in Neder v. United States. Am. J. Crim. L., 28, 229.
Chaves, A. M. (2013). The Doctrine of Harmless Error in Criminal Cases in Massachusetts. Suffolk J. Trial & App. Advoc., 18, 282.
Doyle, J. M. (2010). Learning from error in American criminal justice. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 100, 109.
Edwards, H. T. (1995). To err is human, but not always harmless: When should legal error be tolerated. NYUL Rev., 70, 1167.
Garrett, B. L. (2005). Innocence, harmless error, and federal wrongful conviction law. Wis. L. Rev., 35.
GHULAM SHABBIR alias PAPI Versus the STATE (2020 M L D 1417)
Goff IV, A. K. (1998). Mixed signals: A look at Louisiana's experience with harmless error in criminal cases. La. L. Rev., 59, 1169.
Goldberg, S. H. (1980). Harmless Error: Constitutional Sneak Thief. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 71(4), 421-442.
Gould, J. B., & Leo, R. A. (2010). One hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 825-868.
Greabe, J. M. (2016). The Riddle of Harmless Error Revisited. Hous. L. Rev., 54, 59.
Griffin, L. K. (2016). Criminal Adjudication, Error Correction, and Hindsight Blind Spots. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 73, 165
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
IFTIKHAR ALI Versus the STATE (2022 P Cr. L J 1396)
Johnson, J. S. (2016). Benefits of Error in Criminal Justice. Va. L. Rev., 102, 237.
Kamin, S. (2002). Harmless error and the rights/remedies split. Va. L. Rev., 88, 1.
King, N. J., & Sherry, S. (2008). Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences. Duke LJ, 58, 1.
Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2001). Harmless error. The Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1), 161-192.
MANZOOR AHMED and others Versus the STATE (2021 S C M R 2002)
Mause, P. J. (1968). Harmless Constitutional Error: The Implications of Chapman v. California. Minn. L. Rev, 53, 519.
Monaghan, H. P. (1989). Harmless Error and the Valid Rule Requirement. The Supreme Court Review, 1989, 195-211.
MUHAMMAD AKHTAR and others Versus the STATE (2022 P Cr. L J 591)
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD Versus the STATE (2020 S C M R 2025)
MUHAMMAD BILAL HUSSAIN Versus the STATE (2022 Y L R Note 48)
MUHAMMAD HASSAN alias AAMIR Versus the STATE and (2022 Y L R 805)
MUHAMMAD IRSHAD Versus the STATE (PLJ 2021 Cr.C. 1273)
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE Versus the STATE (2018 P Cr. L J 1538)
Murray, J. (2016). A Contextual Approach to Harmless Error Review. Harv. L. Rev., 130, 1791.
Reggio, R. C. (2019). Harmless Constitutional Error: How a Minor Doctrine Meant to Improve Judicial Efficiency is Eroding America's Founding Ideals.
SHABBIR AHMAD Versus the STATE and others (2016 Y L R Note 13)
Stith, K. (1990). Risk of Legal Error in Criminal Cases: Some Consequences of the Asymmetry in the Right to Appeal, The. U. Chi. L. Rev., 57, 1.
Winkelman, D. A., Yokum, D. V., Cole, L. C., Thompson, S. C., & Robertson, C. T. (2014). An empirical method for harmless error. Ariz. St. LJ, 46, 1405.
Winslow, D. A. (1978). Harmful Use of Harmless Error in Criminal Cases. Cornell L. Rev., 64, 538.
Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 427-443.
ZAFAR IQBAL Versus the STATE and another (2022 Y L R 1357)
