Managerial Discretion and Corporate Governance Mechanism: A Case Study of Public Limited Firms of Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00171Keywords:
Corporate governance, Board Independence, Managerial Discretion, CEO duality, Firm PerformanceAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of board independence, CEO duality (managerial discretion) and corporate governance mechanism on firm performance measured through accounting-base measures i.e. return on assets as well as market-based measure i.e. Tobin’s Q among Pakistan's KSE-listed non-financial firms from 2011 to 2021. The study used software (STATA 12) to analyze the data of 172 firms using the Generalized Method of Movements as well as Random Effect and Fixed Effect regression models to test how each corporate governance and managerial discretion variables contributes to the firm performance. Data was extracted from the annual reports, database, and websites of KSE-listed firms. The presence of board independence contributes positively to firm performance. The study highlights that although CEO duality has no impact on firm performance, but presence of board independence controls the managerial discretion provided by CEO duality and offer the necessary resources as well as monitoring the control the managerial discretion and improve firm performance. This article makes a significant theoretical contribution by synthesizing and extending key governance theories to offer a nuanced understanding of the intricate dynamics within corporate governance (CG), particularly in the specific context of KSE-registered non-financial firms in Pakistan. This research contributes actionable insights that span governance improvement, informed decision-making, regulatory considerations, and strategic performance enhancement, offering practical benefits for the diverse stakeholders in the corporate governance landscape.
References
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of economic literature, 48(1), 58-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 31(3), 377-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397
Armstrong, C. S., Core, J. E., & Guay, W. R. (2014). Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency?.Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3), 383-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.009
Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2010). Outsiders on the board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 236-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.10.004
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). The role of corporate law in the theory of the firm. The journal of law and Economics, 28(1), 179-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467079
Bendickson, J., Davis, P. E., Cowden, B. J., & Liguori, E. W. (2015). Why small firms are different: Addressing varying needs from boards of directors. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 25(2), 41-58.
Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., & Joo, H. (2016). Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship. Strategic management journal, 37(3), 477-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2338
Brick, I. E., & Chidambaran, N. K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of corporate finance, 16(4), 533-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of accounting and public policy, 25(4), 409-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.005
Cabrera-Suárez, M. K., & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2015). Board composition and performance in Spanish non-listed family firms: The influence of type of directors and CEO duality. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 213-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.08.001
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 639-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069408
Coles, J. W., & Hesterly, W. S. (2000). Independence of the chairman and board composition: Firm choices and shareholder value. Journal of management, 26(2), 195-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600202
Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of management, 27(1), 23-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700102
Conyon, M. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2000). The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 110(467), 640-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00577
Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of banking & finance, 31(6), 1771-1794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management journal, 37(6), 1603-1617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256801
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm: An empirical assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), 643-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150806
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Jul., 2003), pp. 371-382. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 19(3), 269-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.3.CO;2-B
Dalwai, T. A. R., Basiruddin, R., & Abdul Rasid, S. Z. (2015). A critical review of relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: GCC banking sector perspective. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2013-0048
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93(6), 1155-1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of financial economics, 83(3), 599-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.006
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001
Faleye, O. (2007). Does one that fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(3), 239-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9028-3
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1985). Organizational forms and investment decisions. Journal of financial Economics, 14(1), 101-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90045-5
Finegold, D., Benson, G. S., & Hecht, D. (2007). Corporate boards and company performance: Review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: an international review, 15(5), 865-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00602.x
Finkelstein, S., & D'aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management journal, 37(5), 1079-1108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256667
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of management review, 24(3), 489-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
García-Meca, E., & Palacio, C. J. (2018). Board composition and firm reputation: The role of business experts, support specialists and community influentials. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 111-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.01.003
Garcia‐Sánchez, I. M., & Martínez‐Ferrero, J. (2017). Independent directors and CSR disclosures: The moderating effects of proprietary costs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 28-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1389
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 107-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
Grove, H., Patelli, L., Victoravich, L. M., & Xu, P. (2011). Corporate governance and performance in the wake of the financial crisis: Evidence from US commercial banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 418-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00882.x
Hambrick, D. C., Misangyi, V. F., & Park, C. A. (2015). The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 323-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0066
Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145-1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.859
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management studies, 37(2), 235-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
Huse, M., & Rindova, V. P. (2001). Stakeholders' expectations of board roles: The case of subsidiary boards. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(2), 153-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013017909067
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
ICMAP (2015). Proposed Strategy for Economic and Industrial Growth of Pakistan, Research & Publications Department, ICMA Pakistan, Karachi.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 22(3), 409-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303
Judge, W. Q., & Talaulicar, T. (2017). Board involvement in the strategic decision-making process: A comprehensive review. Annals of Corporate Governance, 2(2), 51-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/109.00000005
Kang, E., & Zardkoohi, A. (2005). Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate governance: an international review, 13(6), 785-799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00470.x
Kesner, I. F. (1987). Directors' stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of management, 13(3), 499-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300306
Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515523
Klein, P., Shapiro, D., & Young, J. (2005). Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: the Canadian evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 769-784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00469.x
Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of management, 35(4), 981-1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321551
KPMG (2002). Corporate Governance in Europe. KPMG Survey 2001/02. KPMG.
Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2014). CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013
Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.649
Lim, S. H., & Park, Y. S. (2020). Boards Independence according to Outside Director Characteristics and Firm Value: Implications of Boards Composition Reflecting the Legal Standards. Korean Association of Business Education. Korean business education review, 35 (5), 445-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2020.35.5.445
Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of financial economics, 87(2), 308-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004
Macus, M. (2008). Board capability; an interactions perspective on boards of directors and firm performance. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38(3), 98-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825380304
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00591.x
Mutlu, C. C., Van Essen, M., Peng, M. W., Saleh, S. F., & Duran, P. (2018). Corporate governance in China: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 943-979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12331
Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of management studies, 29(4), 411-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00672.x
Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic management journal, 25(5), 453-471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.390
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative science quarterly, 218-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393956
Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 40(2), 283-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000002313
Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2001). A meta‐analysis of board leadership structure and financial performance: Are “two heads better than one”?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(4), 311-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00258
Sako, M., & Kubo, K. (2019). Professionals on Corporate Boards: How do they affect the bottom line?. Available at SSRN 3410294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410294
San Martin-Reyna, J. M., & Duran-Encalada, J. A. (2012). The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2), 106-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.001
Sansing, R. C., & Stocken, P. C. (2007, June). Corporate governance in a competitive environment. AAA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.907344
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization science, 12(2), 99-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Su, W., & Sauerwald, S. (2018). Does corporate philanthropy increase firm value? The moderating role of corporate governance. Business & Society, 57(4), 599-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613961
Sulehri, F. A., Khan, H. M. A., Shahzad, M., & Ali, A. (2023). Beyond the Balance Sheet: Analyzing the Relationship between Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, and Stock Prices in Pakistan's Non-Bank Financial Industry. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 88-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00086
Tehseen, S., & Sajilan, S. (2016). Network competence based on resource-based view and resource dependence theory. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 9(1), 60-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2016.074138
Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., & Bierman, L. (2010). Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members' attention to monitoring. Strategic management journal, 31(9), 946-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.847
Uribe-Bohorquez, M. V., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context. Journal of Business Research, 88, 28-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.005
Van Essen, M., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 873-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9269-1
Wang, G., DeGhetto, K., Ellen, B. P., & Lamont, B. T. (2019). Board antecedents of CEO duality and the moderating role of country‐level managerial discretion: a meta‐analytic investigation. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 172-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12408
Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 431-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0
Wijethilake, C., & Ekanayake, A. (2020). CEO duality and firm performance: the moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1453-1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0321
Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of banking & finance, 49, 534-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
Zahra, S. A., & Stanton, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International journal of management, 5(2), 229-236.
Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002
