Practice of Adaptive Teaching in Improving Students’ Learning: An Effective Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00239Keywords:
Adaptive teaching, students’ learningAbstract
Adaptive teaching is considered fundamental to teaching quality and student learning. It describes teachers’ practices of adjusting their instruction to students’ diverse needs and levels of understanding. It is becoming increasingly clear that not all students require the same education, and the requirement of personalized education is increasingly in demand. This quantitative study was completed through quasi-experimental research design. Systematic sampling technique was used to select 32 students of first semester (male =16, female=16) as sample of the study from the department of Applied Psychology Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. Students’ academic performance was measured in the subject of Functional English. Experiential group was taught through adaptive approach of teaching and control group was taught through traditional approach. Pre-test and post-test were performed. Findings of the study reveal that there was significant mean score difference of academic performance among students of experiential group with respect to pre-test and post-test. Furthermore, there was also found a statistically significant mean score difference on academic performance between experimental group and control group. It is recommended that at university level adaptive of teaching of teaching should be practiced to improve students’ learning.
References
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological conservation, 241, 108224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
Beltramo, J. L. (2017). Developing adaptive teaching practices through participation in cogenerative dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 326-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.007
Brühwiler, C., & Vogt, F. (2020). Adaptive teaching competency. Effects on quality of instruction and learning outcomes. Journal for educational research online, 12(1), 119-142.
Corno, L. Y. N. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational psychologist, 43(3), 161-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178466
Croskerry, P. (2018). Adaptive expertise in medical decision making. Medical teacher, 40(8), 803-808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied developmental science, 24(2), 97-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, S. A., & Vaughn, M. (2022). Adaptive teaching in mathematics: A review of the literature. Educational Review, 74(2), 298-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1722065
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The internet and higher education, 18, 4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Hardy, I., Decristan, J., & Klieme, E. (2019). Adaptive teaching in research on learning and instruction. Journal for educational research online, 11(2), 169-191.
Hardy, I., Meschede, N., & Mannel, S. (2022, December). Measuring adaptive teaching in classroom discourse: Effects on student learning in elementary science education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 1041316). Frontiers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1041316
Hermkes, R., Mach, H., & Minnameier, G. (2018). Interaction-based coding of scaffolding processes. Learning and Instruction, 54, 147-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.003
Iqbal, T., & Nasir, S. (2016). Integrating National Professional Standards with Islamic Teachings: A Path to Educational Excellence in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Options, 3(1), 7-13.
Khan, W. ., & Wali, R. . (2019). Assessing the Impact of a Comprehensive Capacity Building Program on Educational Leadership and Teaching Performance in Public and Private Sectors. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 6(4).
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of educational research, 86(3), 681-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Mahmood, T., & Naz, G. (2015). Teachers’ Attitudes and the Communicative Approach in EFL Classrooms: A Study in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Options, 2(2), 47-54.
Mavroudi, A., Giannakos, M., & Krogstie, J. (2018). Supporting adaptive learning pathways through the use of learning analytics: developments, challenges and future opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 206-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1292531
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., ... & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
Pea, R. D. (2018). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. In Scaffolding (pp. 423-451). Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764411-6
Praetorius, A. K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: The German framework of three basic dimensions. ZDM, 50, 407-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4
Rasheed, L. (2018). The Role of Social Support and Work Engagement in Enhancing Job Performance among Secondary School Teachers: A Quantitative Study in Lahore District. Journal of Policy Options, 5(4), 81-86.
Reiser, B. J. (2018). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. In Scaffolding (pp. 273-304). Psychology Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764411-2
Riaz, M., & Safdar, M. (2016). Exploring Teachers’ Concerns: Student Enrollment and Absenteeism in Primary Schools of Punjab Province. Journal of Policy Options, 3(1), 1-6.
Schipper, T., Goei, S. L., de Vries, S., & van Veen, K. (2018). Developing teachers’ self-efficacy and adaptive teaching behaviour through lesson study. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 109-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.011
Taylor, S. (2022). The psychology of pandemics. Annual review of clinical psychology, 18, 581-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131
Timperley, H. (2013). Learning to practise: A paper for discussion. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Ascd.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43, 615-641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z
Vaughn, M., Parsons, S. A., & Gallagher, M. A. (2022). Challenging scripted curricula with adaptive teaching. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 186-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211065752
Von Esch, K. S., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2018). Preparing mainstream classroom teachers of English learner students: Grounding practice-based designs for teacher learning in theories of adaptive expertise development. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 239-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117717467
Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction–an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124
Wischgoll, A., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2015). Scaffolding—How can contingency lead to successful learning when dealing with errors? ZDM, 47(7), 1147-1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0714-3
Wood, G. (1978). The knew-it-all-along effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(2), 345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.4.2.345
