Impact of Perceived ease of use and Perceived usefulness on Behavioral intention to use Blockchain in Food Supply Firms: The Mediating role Employee Attitude


  • Ikramuddin Junejo Assistant Professor, Department of Management Sciences, SZABIST University Hyderabad Campus, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Taskeen Zahra Buriro Assistant Professor, University of Sufism and Modern Sciences Bhitshah, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Sufyan Ramish Associate Professor, Institute of Business and Health Management (IBHM), Ojha Campus, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Syed Salahuddin Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Indus University, Karachi, Pakistan Author



Perceived ease of use, Perceived usefulness, Employee attitude Behavioral intention to use blockchain, Food supply firms


This study aims to investigate the impact of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on behavioral intention to use blockchain in food supply and the mediating role of employee attitude—primary data gathered with the help of adopted questionnaire through face-to-face survey from food supply firms. A total of 229 cases were considered for data analysis in order to achieve the research objectives of the present study—gathered data analyzed via structural equation modelling (SEM) in SmartPLS version 3. Findings confirmed the direct effect of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and employee attitude on behavioral intention to use blockchain in the food supply. However, perceived usefulness was found to be more significant on behavioral intention to use blockchain due to higher beta value. Furthermore, the indirect effect of employee attitude on perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention to use blockchain positively and significantly suggested a partial mediation effect. For the Blockchain system to gain acceptance, it should be easy to use and be perceived as useful by end users. Therefore, it can be done with the help of user-centred design, initial and advanced staff training, and awareness of the potential benefits of technology.


Akram, S. V, Malik, P. K., Singh, R., Anita, G., & Tanwar, S. (2020). Adoption of blockchain technology in various realms: Opportunities and challenges. Security and Privacy, 3(5), e109.

Aslam, J., Saleem, A., Khan, N. T., & Kim, Y. B. (2021). Factors influencing blockchain adoption in supply chain management practices: A study based on the oil industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(2), 124–134.

Aydemir, R. (2024). Examining the Cluster Life Cycle in the Process of Economic Development. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 18-26.

Bankins, S., Ocampo, A. C., Marrone, M., Restubog, S. L. D., & Woo, S. E. (2024). A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 159–182.

Cetindamar, D., Abedin, B., & Shirahada, K. (2021). The role of employees in digital transformation: a preliminary study on how employees’ digital literacy impacts use of digital technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government adoption: testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865.

Chen, S., Liu, X., Yan, J., Hu, G., & Shi, Y. (2021). Processes, benefits, and challenges for adoption of blockchain technologies in food supply chains: a thematic analysis. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 19, 909–935.

Cizakca, M. (2024). Understanding the Determinants of Foreign Trade Volume in Turkiye: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(1), 19-28.

Dehghani, M., Kennedy, R. W., Mashatan, A., Rese, A., & Karavidas, D. (2022). High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology. Journal of Business Research, 149, 393–411.

Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Graham, G., Foropon, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2023). Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, 108790.

Friedman, N., & Ormiston, J. (2022). Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121403.

Garg, P., Gupta, B., Chauhan, A. K., Sivarajah, U., Gupta, S., & Modgil, S. (2021). Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120407.

Giri, G., & Manohar, H. L. (2023). Factors influencing the acceptance of private and public blockchain-based collaboration among supply chain practitioners: a parallel mediation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(1), 1–24.

Grobbelaar, W., Verma, A., & Shukla, V. K. (2021). Analyzing human robotic interaction in the food industry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1714(1), 12032.

Ibrahim, M., & Rasheed, A. (2024). Exploring the Link Between Customer Relationship Management and Hotel Performance. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 1-10.

Iqbal, M., & Abbas, W. (2024). Determinants of Expected Service Quality: A Comparative Study in Pakistani Banking Sector. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 27-35.

Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2019). Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2009–2033.

Karim, A., & Said, F. (2024). Discussion on Malaysia’s Globalization Journey From Resource-Based Economy to Global Player. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(1), 29-38.

Kayikci, Y., Subramanian, N., Dora, M., & Bhatia, M. S. (2022). Food supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0: Blockchain technology implementation opportunities and impediments from the perspective of people, process, performance, and technology. Production Planning & Control, 33(2–3), 301–321.

Kumari, A., & Devi, N. C. (2023). Blockchain technology acceptance by investment professionals: a decomposed TPB model. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(1), 45–59.

Lezoche, M., Hernandez, J. E., Díaz, M. del M. E. A., Panetto, H., & Kacprzyk, J. (2020). Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Computers in Industry, 117, 103187.

Lv, G., Song, C., Xu, P., Qi, Z., Song, H., & Liu, Y. (2023). Blockchain-Based Traceability for Agricultural Products: A Systematic Literature Review. Agriculture, 13(9), 1757.

Martínez-Castañeda, M., & Feijoo, C. (2023). Use of blockchain in the agri-food value chain: State of the art in Spain and some lessons from the perspective of public support. Telecommunications Policy, 102574.

Mohsen, B. M. (2023). Developments of {Digital} {Technologies} {Related} to {Supply} {Chain} {Management}. Procedia Computer Science, 220, 788–795.

Mukherjee, S., Baral, M. M., Lavanya, B. L., Nagariya, R., Singh Patel, B., & Chittipaka, V. (2023). Intentions to adopt the blockchain: investigation of the retail supply chain. Management Decision, 61(5), 1320–1351.

Munir, Q., Akram, B., & Abbas, S. A. (2024). Understanding Stock Price Dynamics with Dividend-Related Metrics and Financial Indicators in Pakistan’s Non-Financial Sectors. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(1), 1-9.

Ouma, M. A., Onyango, C. A., Ombati, J. M., & Mango, N. (2020). Innovation platform for improving rice marketing decisions among smallholder farmers in Homa-Bay County, Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), 1832399.

Porath, U. (2023). Advancing managerial evolution and resource management in contemporary business landscapes. Modern Economy, 14(10), 1404–1420.

Quader, M. (2024). Exploring Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Satisfaction in Bangladesh’s Private Banking Sector. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 36-45.

Rath, N. (2024). Perceived Advantages and Challenges of Internet Marketing: A Study of Small Entrepreneurs in Punjab, India. Journal of Policy Options, 7(1), 11-17.

Saghafian, M., Laumann, K., & Skogstad, M. R. (2021). Stagewise overview of issues influencing organizational technology adoption and use. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630145.

Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537–547.

Taherdoost, H. (2022). A critical review of blockchain acceptance models—blockchain technology adoption frameworks and applications. Computers, 11(2), 24.

To, A. T., & Trinh, T. H. M. (2021). Understanding behavioral intention to use mobile wallets in vietnam: Extending the tam model with trust and enjoyment. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1891661.

Tofan, M., & Bostan, I. (2022). Some implications of the development of E-commerce on EU tax regulations. Laws, 11(1), 13.

Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Dhaou, S. Ben. (2021). A framework of blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(3), 103444.

Xiong, L. (2024). Driving Growth for SMEs in Laos’ Commercial Sector Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(1), 10-18.

Zaineldeen, S., Hongbo, L., Koffi, A. L., & Hassan, B. M. A. (2020). Technology acceptance model’concepts, contribution, limitation, and adoption in education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5061–5071.







How to Cite

Junejo, I., Buriro, T. Z. ., Ramish, M. S. ., & Salahuddin , S. . (2024). Impact of Perceived ease of use and Perceived usefulness on Behavioral intention to use Blockchain in Food Supply Firms: The Mediating role Employee Attitude. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(2), 174-180.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 178

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>