Striking a Balance: Evaluating Credit Risk with Traditional and Machine Learning Models

Authors

  • Faraz Ahmed PhD Scholar, Department of Business Administration, IQRA University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Kehkashan Nizam PhD Scholar, Department of Business Administration, IQRA University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Zubair Sajid Lecturer, Department of Computer Science, IQRA University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Sunain Qamar MBA, Department of Management Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology University, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Ahsan Lecturer, Department of Commerce, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University, Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00425

Keywords:

Credit Risk, Credit Scoring, Machine Learning Model, Traditional Model, Default

Abstract

This research assesses machine learning models' validity, clarity, and equity, compared to classical models and especially logistic regression in credit risk evaluation. In the traditional model of data management, efficiency and the accuracy of information are challenges; an issue of machine learning models is model selection and multicollinearity. The study intends to help financial institutions establish the best strategy for their needs. Furthermore, it delves into the effect of heterogeneous data sources on the credit risk model using machine learning. The research analyses the implications of using machine learning in assessing credit risk. Interestingly, focusing on peer-to-peer lending platforms, the research aims to deal with the need for more attention to combining machine learning and traditional models in the literature. The deductive method is the application of inferential analyses, the Traditional model is logistic regression, and the Machine Learning model is a neural network (CNN model) based on secondary data from the Kaggle peer-to-peer lending dataset. With likely findings expected to comprise prediction of the probability of default and better availability of loans, risk analysis leads to formulated lending decisions managing a financial portfolio.

References

Alonso Robisco, A. and Carbó Martínez, J.M. (2022). Measuring the model risk-adjusted performance of machine learning algorithms in credit default prediction. Financial Innovation, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00366-1

Alonso, A. and Carbó, J.M. (2020). Machine Learning in Credit Risk: Measuring the Dilemma Between Prediction and Supervisory Cost. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724374

Amaro, M.M. (2020). Credit scoring: comparison of non‐parametric techniques against logistic regression.

Ariza-Garzon, M.J., Arroyo, J., Caparrini, A. and Segovia-Vargas, M.-J. (2020). Explainability of a Machine Learning Granting Scoring Model in Peer-to-Peer Lending. IEEE Access, 8, pp.64873–64890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984412

Bojer, C.S. and Meldgaard, J.P. (2020). Kaggle Forecasting competitions: an Overlooked Learning Opportunity. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.07.007

Breeden, J. (2021). A Survey of Machine Learning in Credit Risk. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2021.008

Doumpos, M., Christos Lemonakis, Dimitrios Niklis and Constantin Zopounidis (2019). Analytical Techniques in the Assessment of Credit Risk. EURO advanced tutorials on operational research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99411-6

Dumitrescu, E., Hué, S., Hurlin, C. and Tokpavi, S. (2021). Machine Learning for Credit Scoring: Improving Logistic Regression with Non-Linear Decision-Tree Effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.053

Fullerton, A.S. and Anderson, K.F. (2021). Ordered regression models: A tutorial. Prevention Science, pp.1-13.

Heydarian, M., Doyle, T.E. and Samavi, R. (2022). MLCM: Multi-Label Confusion Matrix. IEEE Access, 10, pp.19083–19095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151048

Hussin Adam Khatir, A.A. and Bee, M. (2022). Machine learning models and data-balancing techniques for credit scoring: What is the best combination?. Risks, 10(9), p.169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090169

Kigo, S.N., Omondi, E.O. and Omolo, B.O. (2023). Assessing predictive performance of supervised machine learning algorithms for a diamond pricing model. Scientific Reports, 13(1), p.17315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44326-w

Koskimäki, M. (2021). Default prediction in peer-to-peer lending and country comparison. lutpub.lut.fi.

Mhlanga, D. (2021). Financial inclusion in emerging economies: Applying machine learning and artificial intelligence in credit risk assessment. International journal of economic studies, 9(3), p.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030039

Naik, K.S. (2021). Predicting Credit Risk for Unsecured Lending: A Machine Learning Approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02206.

Naili, M. and Lahrichi, Y. (2020). The determinants of banks’ credit risk: Review of the literature and future research agenda. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(1). Alonso Robisco, A. and Carbó Martínez, J.M. (2022). Measuring the model risk-adjusted performance of machine learning algorithms in credit default prediction. Financial Innovation, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00366-1

Noriega, J.P., Rivera, L.A. and Herrera, J.A. (2023). Machine Learning for Credit Risk Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review. Data, 8(11), p.169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data8110169

Quaranta, L., Calefato, F. and Lanubile, F. (2021), May. Kgtorrent: A dataset of python jupyter notebooks from Kaggle. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) (pp. 550-554). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR52588.2021.00072

Razali, N.A.M., Shamsaimon, N., Ishak, K.K., Ramli, S., Amran, M.F.M. and Sukardi, S. (2021). Gap, techniques, and evaluation: traffic flow prediction using machine learning and deep learning. Journal of Big Data, 8(1), pp.1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00542-7

Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Lu, Y., and Yu, X. (2020). A Comparative Assessment of Credit Risk Model Based on Machine Learning——a case study of bank loan data. Procedia Computer Science, 174, pp.141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.069

Downloads

Published

2024-08-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmed, F. ., Nizam, K. ., Sajid, Z. ., Qamar, S. ., & Ahsan. (2024). Striking a Balance: Evaluating Credit Risk with Traditional and Machine Learning Models. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(3), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00425